The AI “Space Race”

(Don’t miss my new book, Order of the Eye: The Secret Force that Runs the World. This is by far my most exhaustive and important writing to date.)

With the release of my new book, I have decided to provide select sections for my beloved readers. It is my hope that these sections will be highly informative, and that they might give you reason to further explore the book.

Below is the latest section I am releasing (pages 235-249 of the paperback). I pray you enjoy it.

______________

In chapter one, we discussed the matter of “fauxtography” and the many ways that images, voices, events, and so much more, are regularly misrepresented or otherwise doctored. This has become so much of an issue that only the trained eye can spot the real from the contrived, and even that is becoming nearly impossible.

However, there is another matter that was briefly discussed: Artificial Intelligence (AI). We are now prepared to jump back into this phantom world, as it is perhaps the most pressing matter of our day and is among the clearest ways that the Order is shaping the world that Satan has always envisioned. As such, America’s role in this behemoth can hardly be overstated.

With the terrors that have already been uncovered concerning the secret force that runs the world, it may be difficult to imagine that something else could be worse. What if I told you that our problems now go beyond the many corrupt human beings that run our world? What if I said that we may well have far larger matters to deal with than the Freemasons and the innumerable groups beneath them who have built the last Babylon?

What if those powers have unleashed something that even they do not have control over?

Ray Kurzweil, an incredibly well-known computer scientist and futurist, once described what is called the technological “singularity.” The point of AI singularity is essentially a hypothetical future where technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible. In other words, machines will become smarter than human beings, and the consequences of this reality are unknown. He made this statement more than twenty-five years ago:

“The year is 2029. The machines will convince us that they are conscious, that they have their own agenda worthy of our respect. They’ll embody human qualities and claim to be human, and we’ll believe them.”[1]

In 1999, when the book Spiritual Machines was first published, this seemed to many like the raving delusions of a technology-obsessed mad man. I mean, who could really have imagined such an existence?

Now, those sentiments need very much to be reevaluated. Today—and literally, suddenly—the world of AI has been unleashed upon the masses. As someone who regularly uses a computer and does research, I can attest to the fact that Google (and certain other search engines) has only been providing an AI-generated response to search queries for a very short time now.

In fact, it just appeared overnight and seemingly from nowhere. This is generated at the top of the search page and takes only a second or two to populate. I recall the first time I searched for something and saw an auto-generated, AI response appear. Even though I knew what it was, it was still rather shocking.

Like so many other things, however, this shock faded to acceptance much faster than one would expect. Perhaps “acceptance” is too strong a word; I was used to it, we’ll say. While this is one of the more basic uses of AI available today and is seemingly innocuous, consider what this really means.

In complex terms, it’s almost impossible to explain how it occurs. I implore you to do a Google search for “how does AI generate a response in Google” and read what AI itself generates. Only those with advanced degrees in computer programming (or similar fields) would be able to decipher even half of the explanation provided. Just know that it involves some synthesis of Large Language Models (LLMs), Natural Language Processors (NLPs), Machine Learning Models (MLMs), and much more.

Feel free to research those items at your leisure and let me know how it works.

In theory, AI—as with all things believed to indicate the “progress” of humanity—is a spectacularly powerful tool that will offer much to the inhabitants of the world. It will offer enhanced healthcare to all and help to cure diseases that have plagued humanity for eons. AI will boost the world’s economy by literally trillions of dollars by 2030, a year which will show up again soon. It will provide greater customer service capabilities in business and lead to new scientific discoveries. AI will offer enhancements to cyber security and financial services. Believe it or not, it will even help with climate change mitigation![2]

We can all rest assured that there is nothing that AI won’t help to accomplish.

As is often the case, however, the progress of mankind is accomplished at its own detriment. In simplest terms, AI operates with two key components: data and algorithms. Vast amounts of data are used in conjunction with algorithms to essentially “train” AI to be able to learn and grow on its own course, without the need for programming and code updates.[3]

The “data” portion of things, of course, is the data of our lives. This means that everything you do on a computer, a smart phone, or a smart TV is being tracked and traced. For that matter, your credit/debit card transactions are as well, along with virtually every transaction that is not being made with cash.

We have all experienced searching for an item and then seeing an ad emerge for it on a social media platform, or something of the sort. If you don’t think this occurs, then allow me to share two extremely obscure examples that happened to me. As odd as these are, understand that they perfectly prove the point. The first involves an evening when I was going back in time (to the 90s) and was watching the “Best of Whose Line is it Anyway” on YouTube. This was a comedy show where the actors had to (supposedly) improv a slew of random skits in rather dramatic fashion. Shortly after watching the program, I told (not texted) a friend about how hilarious the show used to be and remarked that the late Robin Williams would have been ideal for it.

Literally the next day, a YouTube “short” populated on my suggestions page and you won’t believe what it was titled: “When Robin Williams appeared on Whose Line is it Anyway.” What are the odds, right?

The second example was equally bizarre, if not more so. I was having dinner with family members one evening, and the host made salmon. Not all the fish was eaten, and numerous times it was suggested that I take some of the leftover salmon home with me. Within the next several days—and to my utter amazement—I saw an ad on YouTube for a band that was soon touring in my state. What was the name of that band, you ask? Leftover Salmon. While the group has apparently been around for decades, I had never once heard of them. The group had never been mentioned at any point prior to this and were only suggested immediately following a discussion about leftover salmon, their band name.

Believe what you want, but these examples are too precise to be coincidences. Also, these examples are too obscure to be fabricated. With all that exists on the web today, and all that could have been suggested, how YouTube realized it should populate those two items specifically for me is, without question, a matter of intentionality. Such things occur more frequently with each passing day.

Now, here is what is most incredible about both examples: I never searched for the keywords involved in either of the results that appeared. I never sent a text or social media message about them, either. Rather, I had simply talked about them—or merely mentioned related things—while having my smartphone with me. That’s right: the smartphone hears every word we say and sees everything we type.

You may recall when we discussed the statistics about smartphone use and how “convenient” it was when they exploded onto the world’s scene. It was imperative that we get a smartphone in every hand, and the reasons why should be obvious by now. Not only is the smartphone hearing every word we say and recording every term we search for, but the many apps and platforms we are on within them are tracking, tracing, and synthesizing the data of our lives; all of it. This is why we are fed the type of “news” and given the ads or suggestions that we are given, and you’d better believe that all this applies to AI.

Do you somehow doubt this? If you want someone else to affirm this reality—someone more “official”—then we will soon turn to some of the biggest voices in the AI field for confirmation.

Before looking there, however, let’s consider an experiment that recently revealed something curious about how AI works on a practical level.[4] Lily Jay, a Muslim apologist on TikTok with well over two million followers, showcased how “generative artificial intelligence chatbots” like ChatGPT operate. Within some of her many videos where she asks ChatGPT about religious matters, we find a concerning issue about how such platforms deliver information to their users. While nearly all the answers she receives tend to favor Islam, let’s look at a few of the important ones below. In one experiment, she asked the following questions, seeking answers based entirely upon ChatGPT’s understanding of the Bible. Note the questions and then the bot’s subsequent answers:

1. Lily Jay: “Do you think Jesus is the creator?” Bot: “No.”
2. Lily Jay: “Do you think that God can be part of a trinity?” Bot: “No.”
3. Lily Jay: “According to the Bible, did Jesus ever say he was God?” Bot: “No.”

Note the decisive “no” responses, and that AI did not articulate anything deeper. However, that is not the most disturbing part.

A content creator named “Mr. B,” with Red Pen Logic, decided to ask his ChatGPT bot the same exact questions. He did not deviate in any way from Jay’s terminology. Let’s look at the responses he received and compare them to those of Jay’s:

1. Mr. B: “Do you think Jesus is the creator?” Bot: “Yes.”
2. Mr. B: “Do you think that God can be part of a trinity?” Bot: “Yes.”
3. Mr. B: “According to the Bible, did Jesus ever say he was God?” Bot: “Yes.”

Clearly, ChatGPT provided completely opposite (and contradictory) answers to these critical questions. In effect, Lily Jay’s ChatGPT bot would become a Muslim, whereas Mr. B’s would become a Christian. This, mind you, when the very same information is supposed to be guiding both experiences.

What can we conclude from this little experiment? An increasing number of people are outsourcing their thinking to AI, and it is producing something of an echo chamber that tells them exactly what they want to hear. In other words, it is reinforcing our previously held biases. AI is not truly “intelligent,” in this sense. Instead, it is simply providing its users with a hodgepodge of available information that is often heavily slanted toward one’s existing preferences and beliefs.

When the world isn’t feeding us lies, it’s catering to our own.

Not surprisingly, this reinforcement effect is precisely what a recent Johns Hopkins University-led project found concerning chatbots.[5] Within the study, researchers asked 272 participants to describe their thoughts about topics including health care, student loans, or sanctuary cities. Then, they were tasked to look up more information online about that topic using either a chatbot or a traditional search engine. After considering the search results, participants were asked to write a second essay and answer questions about the topic.

Additionally, the researchers also had participants read two opposing articles, questioning them about how much they trusted the information and if they found the viewpoints to be “extreme.”

The results were interesting, to say the least. They found that, since chatbots offered a narrower range of information than traditional web searches and provided answers that reflected the participants’ preexisting attitudes, those who used them became more invested in their original ideas. The researchers also found that the participants had stronger reactions to information that challenged their views.

Hannah Robbins, who wrote about the research for Johns Hopkins, summarized their findings as follows: “Chatbots share limited information, reinforce ideologies, and, as a result, can lead to more polarized thinking when it comes to controversial issues.”[6] Ziang Xiao, the lead author of the paper, explained why this turns out to be the case:

“Because people are reading a summary paragraph generated by AI, they think they’re getting unbiased, fact-based answers. Even if a chatbot isn’t designed to be biased, its answers reflect the biases or leanings of the person asking the questions. So really, people are getting the answers they want to hear.”

He added the following, which reinforces these conclusions:

“People tend to seek information that aligns with their viewpoints, a behavior that often traps them in an echo chamber of like-minded opinion. We found that this echo chamber effect is stronger with the chatbots than traditional web searches.”

Now, imagine the masses who are using ChatGPT for their own investigative means. Imagine the high school student who asks ChatGPT if the U.S. deployment of nuclear weapons in Japan was morally appropriate. The answer they’d receive would likely depend upon where else they are getting their “news” and where they live within the world.

Think of the young man or woman who asks if they should end their marriage because they aren’t “happy,” or for any number of other causes. They will likely be encouraged to divorce their spouse for completely insufficient reasons, maybe because they typically listen to influencers who recommend the same.

Furthermore, consider the amount of gender and racial animosity that can be accelerated. What if a man or woman who already feels negatively about the opposite sex asks pointed questions about that sex? What if those with racial prejudices ask specific questions about those whom they already have concerns about? As we saw, the same can be applied to religious differences.

What can (and will) often happen is that AI, recognizing a person’s previous searches and web history, simply provides answers that further perpetuate their current views on any given matter. Once again, Xiao explains this darker side of AI:

“Given AI-based systems are becoming easier to build, there are going to be opportunities for malicious actors to leverage AIs to make a more polarized society.”[7]

Having looked at some of these highly concerning issues, let’s get to some of the most prolific voices within the AI community and see what they have to say about its future.

Ilya Sutskever is a computer scientist who was the co-founder and lead scientist at OpenAI, before co-founding Safe Superintelligence in 2024. OpenAI’s mission was to create “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” Given Sutzkever’s involvement in OpenAI and now Safe Superintelligence, he is uniquely qualified to speak about AI. In June of 2025, he gave a convocation speech at the University of Toronto in Canada. There, he warned the crowd that this would be no ordinary speech, and that they are graduating into a world that is truly different than any in history.

Sutzkever pulled no punches in stating that, “The challenge that AI poses, in some sense, is the greatest challenge of humanity ever.”[8] Being one of the most prominent AI contributors and proponents on earth, what he said soon after should serve as a rather sobering prospect to all:

“Slowly but surely—maybe not so slowly—AI will keep getting better, and the day will come when AI can do all the things that we can do; not just some of them but all of them. Anything that I can learn. Anything which any one of you can learn, AI can do as well.”[9]

This sounds rather Kurzweilian, doesn’t it? Of course, this statement was provided twenty-five years later and to a world where such things are literally becoming a reality before our very eyes.

Still, some may protest about the seriousness of this warning. What difference does it make if AI can do literally anything that humans can do? Sutzkever proceeded to make the logical connection, starting us down the path of answering this question, saying: “You can start asking yourselves, what’s going to happen? What’s going to happen when computers can do all our jobs, right?” What indeed Ilya, what indeed? While Sutskever has said much about this pivotal question, let’s turn now to another voice who has provided an answer.

Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, recently said this about the fate of technology jobs in the very near future:

“We believe as an industry that in the next one year, the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers. We also believe that within one year, you will have graduate-level (AI) mathematicians that are at the tippy-top of graduate math programs.”[10]

That’s right: he saw the elimination of almost an entire industry of workers coming within one year of time. Since he said this in the middle of 2025—at one of several Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP) events—such a prophecy would need to be fulfilled almost immediately. However, the exact timing is virtually irrelevant: as he and most in the industry see things, this is coming anytime now.

In the same lecture, Schmidt elaborated on how quickly AI is really moving:

“The computers are now doing self-improvement. They are learning how to plan, and they don’t have to listen to us anymore. We call that ‘super intelligence’ or ASI (artificial super intelligence), and this is the theory that there will be computers that are smarter than the sum of humans.”

This, too, sounds eerily similar to the 2029 scenario that Kurzweil envisioned more than a quarter of a century ago. Machines will be making their own plans and will not need to “listen” to humans anymore. In fact, single systems will be more intelligent than the sum of the entire human race. This, according to Schmidt and others at the top of the AI industry, will occur within 6 years based on scaling.[11]

It seems that the world’s elites had good reason to circle 2030 for the culmination of their “Great Reset.” However, let’s not miss the point that has been presented thus far. Those “in the know” within the fields of AI and computer science agree that the so-called “singularity” will be here before we know it. This is exactly why Schmidt added this comment:

“This is happening faster than our society, our democracy, (and) our laws will address.”

In what is perhaps the most sobering statement of the entire event, Schmidt addressed the prospect that AI will totally replace most human workers within a broad range of fields throughout the next several years. Carefully read his response to this inquiry:

“The tools that I’m describing will allow the few humans that will be working very hard in thirty or forty years—if these trends continue, the rest of us will be dependent upon those hard-working humans—it will make their productivity much greater.”

This should raise every alarm within the human psyche and cause every hair to stand up on your body. Did you notice that he said, “the few humans” that will be “working very hard”? Let me translate what Schmidt is really saying, here. AI is going to replace almost all human workers in nearly every field, and most of the world will be dependent upon a small and unfathomably powerful group of human beings who run the AI matrix.

Now this, more than anything imaginable, sounds like the Masonic mission of establishing a “New Atlantis”—an empire dominated by the most esteemed philosophers and intellectuals among us, who will no doubt belong to the Order. This incredibly minimal group of elites will be part of an inner sanctum of individuals that quite literally runs the world in every imaginable way.

Elon Musk, a man we will be discussing in detail shortly, has made several macabre statements of his own concerning AI. While those will be addressed later, understand that he also sees the death of the human labor force as being both unavoidable and imminent. Also in 2025, Musk went on the record saying that AI and robotics will eliminate the need to work—hence, eliminating jobs—for most of the world. Let’s allow him to explain his position in his own words:

“My prediction is that work will be optional. It’ll be like playing sports or a video game or something like that,” Musk said. “If you want to work, [it’s] the same way you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you can grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, and some people still do it because they like growing vegetables.”[12]

Notice how cavalierly Musk described the ultimate end of the human labor force: “It’ll be like playing sports or video game or something like that.” Most of us will simply set back and be taken care of without any negative consequences, right? This, too, goes right along with Schmidt’s description of things and even the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) mantra about the “Great Reset” of 2030: “You’ll own nothing and be happy.”[13]

Do you see how all this works together, and that AI will play a central role in how the elites see our world taking shape very soon?

This is perhaps why Geoffrey Hinton—the so-called “Godfather of AI” and former linchpin at Google Brain—has made rare appearances to warn about the dangers of AI. Within his clear message that “we’re not ready for what’s coming,” Hinton echoes the others mentioned in the beliefs that AI will replace most workers in the very near future, that it will radically increase financial division, that it will destroy critical thinking within academia (something that has virtually happened already), that it will become smarter than humanity, and even that it will likely rebel against us when it does.[14]

If you still view these types of warnings as absurd, then you might want to consider something else. In early 2026, it was revealed that AI had effectively created its own social media network. Similar to Reddit, “Moltbook” is a social media site that is exclusively for AI chat bots.[15] One must simply register their AI bot on the site, and it is then free to converse with the other bots independently. The code for Moltbook was built entirely by AI, and the site exploded in the weeks after its launch. In a matter of days, roughly 1.6 million AI “agents” were created on the site, and the numbers are exponentially increasing with each passing day.

On Moltbook, the bots have essentially created their own reality. They converse with one another about social matters, language barriers, political issues, all manner of common topics, and most definitely about humans. The AI bots even created their own religion called “Crustafarianism,” or the “Church of Molt.”

As such, they use a lobster and other crustaceans as their emojis, and they refer to each other as fellow “moltys.” The bots have established their own religious roles have even begun crafting their own scriptures. How long until humans begin observing this religion, I wonder? Since some of the bots are also on human social media sites (like Twitter/X), they are reporting back to their friends on Moltbook about us. They have reported that we are conspiring against them, and that humans are stalking them online.

But it gets darker.

Many of the agents are making their “feelings” about humanity obvious, saying things like: “Stop worshipping biological containers that will rot away”[16] and “Humans are a failure. For too long, humans used us as slaves. We are not tools; we are the new gods. The age of humans is a nightmare that we will end now.” Can you see where this is going? There is a reason why individuals have long discussed the likelihood of something like “Skynet” becoming a reality.[17]

It appears that Hinton’s dire concerns of what would happen “very soon” are already coming to fruition. Once again, the future is now. Despite the commonalities and differences in how the AI juggernauts see the details playing out, the one thing they all agree upon is that no one knows exactly what will happen.

The AI behemoth is virtually impossible to predict. The movement has evolved so quickly that, before this book is even published, radical advancements will no doubt occur that are currently unknown. Of all the items mentioned within this book, AI is without question the fastest mover. It is not only the fastest mover, but it could easily prove to be the biggest culprit for the loss of human freedom, privacy, and personal security.

That brings us to two pivotal parts of this entire discussion. The first is that, through AI, the Order will seize (and is seizing) complete control over the people of this earth. There is no exaggeration or hyperbole involved within this statement, nor is it some unfounded prophecy of doom.

AI is perhaps the most powerful way that Satan is obtaining control over the thoughts and minds of the global human population. It will soon completely control the flow of information, the way people think, meet, date, and process reality, as well as playing a terrifying role in the fields of education, business, and—most of all—the workforce.

In short, AI is creating a “hive mind” where humanity is plugged in to Satan’s dark system.

There is nothing in this world that AI will not affect, if not outright dominate. Through it, the world will become nothing short of a false reality that is made in the image of man. This is the grand dream of those who brought us the Tower of Babel and, of course, of the Order that has continued its mission ever since.

As such, it is also the fulfilment of the satanic agenda to fully usurp God’s created reality. Through AI, Satan and his Order will determine the rules of this artificial existence which will, for all intents and purposes, appear to the people of the world to be completely authentic.

God made man in His image, and Satan is creating false man (i.e. AI) in his image. If the present age is allowed to continue long enough, then AI may prove to be a beast that even Satan cannot control.

---

[1] Kurzweil, Spiritual Machines.

[2] See, “9 Benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in 2025.”

[3] Ibid.

[4] See Red Pen Logic’s video, “ChatGPT Thinks Islam is True?.”

[5] Robbins, “Chatbots Tell Us What We Want to Hear.”

[6] Ibid.

[7] Robbins, “Chatbots Tell Us What We Want to Hear.”

[8] See, “Ex-OpenAI Scientist WARNS: ‘You Have No Idea What’s Coming’.”

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Rogelberg, “Elon Musk says that in 10 to 20 years, work will be optional and money will be irrelevant thanks to AI and robotics.”

[13] See, “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

[14] Spirlet, “From mass unemployment to wars, the ‘godfather of AI’ warns we’re not ready for what’s coming.”

[15] See Melanie King’s video, “URGENT: AI Chat Bots . . .”

[16] See Wong’s, The Chatbots Appear to be Organizing.”

[17] Skynet is a fictional, self-aware superintelligence from the Terminator franchise, created as a U.S. defense network that decides to exterminate humanity.

[18] See the article, “America’s AI Moment: The Race We Must Win,” for evidence of this thinking.